From 5048cb8806d522b9f926b8b546df44d810b1f182 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: mehbark Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:29:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ccgoto: wording tweak --- site-src/ccgoto.mdx | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/site-src/ccgoto.mdx b/site-src/ccgoto.mdx index fb15c94..3861e6e 100644 --- a/site-src/ccgoto.mdx +++ b/site-src/ccgoto.mdx @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ In his 1968 letter, [A case against the GO TO statement](https://www.cs.u (known only by that name), Dijkstra said “[t]he go to statement as it stands is just too primitive, it is too much an invitation to make a mess of one’s program.” Unfortunately, scheme programmers aren’t given that invitation. That’s no fair! -Fortunately, scheme has a procedure, `call/cc`, that we can use to emulate the control flow that `GOTO` provides. +Fortunately, scheme has a procedure, `call/cc`, that we can use to emulate the style of control flow that `GOTO` provides. We can use syntactic abstraction to invite scheme programmers to make a mess of their programs in a limited context. ## How `GOTO` works